Print Advertisement Over the past three decades I have noted two disturbing tendencies in both science and society: And, as such rankings and divisions are wont to do, they include an assessment of worth, with the hard sciences and technical writing respected the most, and the soft sciences and popular writing esteemed the least.
The Use of the Scientific Method The Use of the Scientific Method The scientific method is like a never ending road constantly growing and having numerous possibilities for growth and improvement for any idea.
In many aspects, it is the foundation for science and everything that has been proven today. Throughout history, the scientific method has been used to build theories, laws, and essentially create a platform for the scientific community to contribute ideas to one another.
For instance, with the mystery of The Miami Circle, the scientific method was used numerous times in order to find the truth behind the mysterious anthropological discovery.
With the scientific method, anthropologists were able to trace back the history of the Miami Circle and uncover its truth. The scientific method is a standardized procedure that is used in creating theories, laws, and ideas, in order to build a consistent, reliable and non-arbitrary depiction of the world.
In the scientific method, scientists must first look at the object of interest. Then collect research on the topic to fully understand what they are going to be observing. Then, through repeated experimentation, the hypothesis can be finalized as a theory or proven to be false. In science, the scientific method is repeated numerously until a theory is created After considerable testing of the theory by possibly many different scientists, it may become what is known as a law.
Theories are not just simply theories and the book does not just simply close. Theories can always be proven wrong or even extended at anytime. One of the best aspects of science has always been its openness to improvement.
Theories in science are always being refigured in hopes of improvement ,or even completely changed New research frequently renders old ideas outdated ideas or incomplete ones.
Theories are always open ended. This is why the use of the scientific method is so important. With the mystery of The Miami Circle, the use of the scientific method allowed anthropologists to find the purpose of the mysterious holes in the ground.
The Miami circle was first discovered July of Midden was found at the site which yielded the initial building that was set to be constructed on the land. In the beginning the anthropologists hypothesized that the circle was formed by the Almac or the Maya.
Through carbon dating, they realized that they were wrong about their initial hunch. There was duricrust found along the holes, which indicated that the holes were there for possible over hundreds maybe even thousands of years.
The anthropologists then speculated that the Miami Circle is believed to have once been occupied by the Tequesta Indians.
They then further confirmed this with the findings of tools used by the Tequestas during the excavation. Ricisak further proved this hypothesis by the comparisons with other past tribes structural features. The scientific method is the basis and foundation for almost everything in science, from social science to the physical sciences.
While in the physical sciences, the basis mainly consists of experimental data that relies on repeated experiments and constant lab results with standard measurements.
While both sciences differ, they share the same scientific model in order to have results and information. Throughout the whole documentary and the explanation of the Miami Circle, the use of the scientific method was very prevalent.
I realized that although one hypothesis is false, the pursue of the truth did not end. In a way, being unsuccessful with one hypothesis only made the anthropologists even closer to uncovering the truth.
The scientific method teaches people how to think and critically analyze things in any aspect of life. It teaches us how to justify, understand, and analyze almost everything we do or see.
References Cited Bradford, Alina. Accessed July 03, Miami Circle Atlas Obscura. Accessed July 05, Essay UK - http: Search our thousands of essays: There are UK writers just like me on hand, waiting to help you.
Each of us is qualified to a high level in our area of expertise, and we can write you a fully researched, fully referenced complete original answer to your essay question. Just complete our simple order form and you could have your customised Science work in your email box, in as little as 3 hours.
About this resource This Science essay was submitted to us by a student in order to help you with your studies.Social sciences have overemphasized statistical data analysis, often limiting their logical models to prediction of the direction of effect, oblivious of its quantitative extent.
A better balance of methods is possible and will make social sciences more relevant to society. The present essay is a general introduction to the human sciences; subsequent essays will deal with a number of methodological issues and debates in the human sciences, and may eventually discuss the contributions of various social theorists, such as Max Weber, Alfred .
Psychology, they insist, is a pseudo-science. It has the trappings of science but not its substance. ” Another study, trying to prove if psychology was a science came when the American Psychological Association appointed Sigmund Koch to study the research methods of psychology and prove its scientific standing.
Dr Peter Judge | Tutorial Essays for Science Subjects 4 1. Never use a metaphor, simile or figure of speech which you are used to seeing in print. Avoid terms such as: o The nucleus is the nerve centre of the cell o Adipose tissue is the storehouse of the body o Chlorophyll is the molecule of life o This analysis opens the door for 2.
Helmenstine holds a Ph.D. in biomedical sciences and is a science writer, educator, and consultant. She has taught science courses at the high school, college, and graduate levels.
In some cases, systematic observation using the scientific method is a relatively straightforward process which can.
Hard science and soft science are colloquial terms used to compare scientific fields on the basis of perceived methodological rigor, exactitude, and objectivity.    Roughly speaking natural sciences (e.g. biology, chemistry, physics) are considered "hard", whereas the social sciences (e.g.
economics, psychology, sociology) are usually .